KBIS, bank details, supporting documents: how to avoid leaks
> TL;DR: Supporting documents shared in recruiting software quickly become a weak point when storage and link logic are not reviewed seriously.
Supporting documents remain a classic weak point
KBIS extracts, bank details, identity documents, contracts, and certificates often move between product, support, and operations. As soon as document storage is too permissive, these files become an immediate risk.
For more — see our external review for your product.
Useful checks
For software vendors
CleanIssue specializes in security reviews for software handling sensitive data. If you're building a product, payroll tool, or ATS and want an external review of your exposure before a client audit or security questionnaire, see our offer for software vendors.
Key Takeaways
Building software? CleanIssue performs security audits for your product in real-world conditions, no source code access needed. For a first read of your exposure, start with an external review of your application.
Go further
Related articles
Three adjacent analyses to keep exploring the same attack surface.
Sensitive PDF documents: where teams get storage wrong
Public buckets, guessable URLs, app-only access control — the most common storage mistakes for sensitive documents.
Telehealth: video link security and shared attachments
Telehealth platforms often share video and documents via links. What must expire, be signed, or never leave.
Supabase multi-tenant: the data-separation checklist
What to review in a multi-tenant product built on Supabase: RLS policies, organization scope, document storage, and role logic.
Sources
Editorial analysis based on official vendor, project, and regulator documentation.
Related services
If this topic maps to a real risk in your stack, these are the most relevant CleanIssue audits.