Back to blog
guidebusinessaudit

How to choose a cybersecurity audit provider in France

Published on 2026-02-127 min readFlorian

The cybersecurity audit market in France is opaque

You're looking for a provider to audit your application. The problem: offers are incomparable, certifications are confusing, and prices vary 10x. Here are concrete criteria for making the right choice.

Criterion 1: Specialization

A provider specializing in application security doesn't have the same profile as one specializing in network security or documentary compliance. If your need is to test your web application's security, choose an auditor who understands your technical stack (Supabase, Firebase, Laravel, React, Next.js).

Ask for examples of vulnerabilities found on stacks similar to yours.

Criterion 2: Methodology

Two main approaches:

Automated: the provider runs scanners (Nessus, Burp Suite) and sends you the report. Fast and inexpensive, but misses business logic flaws.

Manual: an expert manually analyzes your application, understands the business logic, and identifies flaws scanners miss. More expensive but significantly more effective.

The best provider combines both: automated scanning for coverage + manual analysis for depth.

Criterion 3: Certifications

PASSI (Prestataire d'Audit de Securite des Systemes d'Information): ANSSI qualification for information systems audits. Mandatory for critical infrastructure (OIV) audits. Not necessary for an SMB application audit, but a quality guarantee.

OSCP, OSWE, BSCP: individual certifications of the auditor. They validate real technical skills in pentesting or web security.

Provider's ISO 27001: proves the provider manages its own systems' security. Consistent but not sufficient alone.

Criterion 4: The report and deliverables

The report must contain a clear description of each vulnerability, proof of exploitation (PoC), the concrete impact on your data and business, and prioritized remediation recommendations.

A good report is directly actionable by your technical team. A bad report is a 100-page PDF of scanner false positives.

Criterion 5: Cost and timeline

  • Automated scan: €500-€2,000 (results in 24h)
  • Passive audit: €1,900-€4,200 (results in 48h)
  • Application pentest: €5,000-€20,000 (results in 2-4 weeks)
  • Full audit with pentest: €15,000-€50,000 (results in 4-8 weeks)
  • Red flags

  • The provider guarantees "zero flaws" after their audit
  • No written report, only a debrief call
  • Exclusive use of automated scanners sold as "expert audit"
  • No verifiable references in your sector
  • Abnormally low price (a real audit takes expert time)
  • Questions to ask

  • What is your methodology (automated, manual, mixed)?
  • Can you show a sample report (anonymized)?
  • Do you have experience with my technical stack?
  • What happens if you find a critical flaw during the audit?
  • Is the report actionable by my developers?
  • Why external review is a good first step

    An external review needs no access to your servers, doesn't disrupt production, and delivers results in 48h. It's the fastest, lowest-risk way to evaluate your security posture. If critical flaws are found, you can then order a targeted pentest on the identified points.

    Related articles

    Three adjacent analyses to keep exploring the same attack surface.

    Sources

    Written by Florian
    Reviewed on 2026-02-12

    Editorial analysis based on official vendor, project, and regulator documentation.

    Related services

    If this topic maps to a real risk in your stack, these are the most relevant CleanIssue audits.

    Need an external review of your HR SaaS?

    Share your product, stack, and client context. We will come back with the right review scope.

    Discuss your audit