Attorney-client privilege & GDPR: specific obligations for legaltechs
> TL;DR: Legaltechs have a dual obligation: GDPR + professional secrecy. A breach = ethical violation.
The dual obligation
Legaltechs are subject to GDPR AND professional secrecy. A security breach violates both.
Art. 226-13 Penal Code
Revealing information covered by professional secrecy: 1 year imprisonment and €15,000 fine. This is criminal, not administrative.
What we find
Key Takeaways
Building HR, payroll, or recruiting software? CleanIssue performs security audits for HR SaaS in real-world conditions, no source code access needed. For a first read of your exposure, start with an external review of your application.
Related articles
Three adjacent analyses to keep exploring the same attack surface.
Legaltech and attorney-client privilege: what vendors forget when storing acts
Attorney-client privilege requires access controls few tools actually apply. What to verify in legal products.
GDPR Article 32: technical security obligations for web applications
What "appropriate technical measures" means concretely — encryption, access control, testing, pseudonymization. With code examples.
Legaltech: electronic signature mistakes that weaken evidentiary value
A poorly implemented e-signature can be contested in court. Critical points to review in a legaltech product.
Sources
Editorial analysis based on official vendor, project, and regulator documentation.
Related services
If this topic maps to a real risk in your stack, these are the most relevant CleanIssue audits.